Minding the body: Adventures from the neck down

Friday, 2/19/16: Morning workout (Abs/Forearms/Wrists/Hands)

  • 0620 – Wake up, Ian!
  • 0635 – PRE-WORKOUT EATS: Quick protein shake – 8g LP.
  • 0705 – At the gym w/Nathan! Commence the movement!
  1. Warmup 90 second static stretch of each of the following: upper hamstrings, lower hamstrings, internal obliques/rectus abdominus
    1. Elliptical – 12 minutes @ level 10, “rolling hills” setting. Completed 3.8 miles &  100kCals
  2. Abdominal Circuit Four repetitions of the following, with <15s between repts & sets
    1. 10 frog kicks (hanging leg raises, knees 2 chest) – FAST up, SLOW down (w/ankle weight)
    2. 10 good morning twists (5/leg) – 20lb bar over shoulders
    3. 1 minute plank – rotate hips, move in circles (for added difficulty)
  3. Wrist & Forearm Circuit 5 repetitions of the following
    1. 30 seconds jump rope
    2. 30 seconds shadow boxing, w/5 pound dumbbells for resistance
    3. 30 seconds handstand (both hands)
    4. 10 seconds handstand (right hand only, left hand only)
    5. 30 seconds shadow boxing, w/yellow resistance band
    6. 10 seconds shadow boxing, no resistance
  5. Cool down
    1. 200 meter swim, easy

POST-WORKOUT EATS: 1 serving of melon, cantaloupe, pineapple, 2 slices of toast, water, some breakfast potatoes, and some scrambled eggs. Protein shake – 25g LP.

Uhhhhh. Why’d I share my exercise routine from yesterday on a blog about the human mind? (Shouldn’t this go on me and Matthew’s PHITNESS PAYGE???)

Up until this point most of the junk emanating from this digital thoughtstream has to do with personal opinions, arguments, and beliefs of mine. All of these are geared towards consciousness/the mind/awareness/whatever you’re currently experiencing…but have I entered any useful discussions? Can I even define or rationalize my favorite idea to myself, let alone others? When I think or talk about consciousness my initial inspiration and eventual word-vomit ends up fitting a pretty small range of concepts, experiences, & possibilities. But today it struck me that there are a huge collection of ways to describe, share, and learn from the experiences of being a brain – of being a person. There’s at least 7 billion unique ways to be conscious! And many of these lives & realities I haven’t even considered!!! Why, at age 24, is my vocabulary (and my thinking) so limited to the neuro-realm on this subject?

It should be obvious enough that there are a lot of ways to interpret or describe thinking, awareness, & reality. Right? Yeah. Yet within the existing collection of blog posts on this page of mine I in hindsight notice a very narrow perspective – a rather self-serving & disappointing tendency to stick to the stuff that seems extremely & specifically relevant to the subjects of neuroscience and philosophy. So many questions, but so few possibilities…That doesn’t seem right! Science is great and all, but who ever got anywhere by staying entirely their own scholastic comfort zone? Last time I checked I had an academic blog for that. Even though these are the areas of my education, familiarity, and enjoyable intellectual romping, there is certainly a big world beyond one’s first playground. There is no need or benefit to focusing exclusively or only on how to characterize consciousness from the slant of neuroscience & philosophy – at least not all the time. Thinking that way hasn’t even been useful at all towards writing or sharing things with you all – I withhold many (or most) of the thoughts I would otherwise explore, unpack, and possibly share, simply because they can’t quite be pidgeonholed into my career focus.

Let’s avoid that!

There’s a saying from a beloved Zen Master of today that I think of:

In the beginner’s mind there are many possibilities.

In the expert’s mind there are few.

My narrow focus and interests suggest I consider myself a seasoned expert on the subject of consciousness – having seen and heard just about everything that could be shown or said about it. But I’m the OPPOSITE of a seasoned expert on minds – I’m just learning about them now! I’m a beginner. And like this little saying above – are not beginners open to and intrigued by the many possibilities? Can’t I explore some of my ideas or random queries without jumping into the physiology of behavior? These ruminations have me considering that I need to broaden my horizens just a bit, write more loosely about consciousness, and also to just write about stuff. Listening to existing ideas and conversations is surely as or more revealing than attempting to spew out something original of my own.

That is a bit disheartening, but also awesome – there’s so much to learn!

With that said, and your workout challenge above, GET OFF OF HERE & GET SOME EXERCISE!


ARTISTS as CRITICS (MN Artists 4 x Forum)

I went to an awesome event at the Walker Art Center on January 14th, 2016. At this event we were all encouraged to reach out to the editor at mnartists.org with ideas or proposals for collaborative pieces. Oh, and to write, write, write.



After reaching out to the editor at mnartists.org with several ideals and proposals for collaborative pieces, I haven’t heard back – so I’ve just been writing, writing, writing. It really would be fun to share this writing with you but it really would be more fun and informative with their help. So this blank entry will be slowly updated if and when I hear back from the editor 🙂

Contemplative Cops: Using Meditation in Law Enforcement

Should law enforcement officers engage in on-the-job meditation practices as a regular part of training or workflow? Might the use of certain contemplative exercises such as mindfulness training enhance the ability of police officers to perform their job safely (or recover afterwards)? Or, more simply: would meditating be good for cops? Should the police meditate? This note is written in response to a few online publications about this question that briefly describe the increasing osmosis between law enforcement and intentional, secular meditation practice. Only several online pieces from the early 2000s will be discussed [rather than the history/subject matters of police practice & contemplative practice in general]. If anyone doubts that exploring all possible strategies to reduce police violence is important, let’s just step into the comment area. Before initiating or joining any critical conversation about something as subjective as meditation (or something as serious as law enforcement) we might want to take a few things into consideration.

First, as your author, I am not [& never have been] ordained or certified as a meditation teacher — nor as a law enforcement officer. This places me in a position of relative inexperience when it comes to the following topics, and I encourage any and all from these communities to provide input (or contact me at iandoyleolson@gmail.com). My relevant expertise will be mentioned below but it is not of primary importance for our conversation anyway.

Second, both law enforcement and meditation are kind of hard to talk about with any truth or accuracy. This is because law enforcement and meditation are both quite common and and varied – they happen all over the place, and in a lot of different ways. This piece of writing you are looking at is coming from someone with no experience as a police officer and no authority on meditation. This means that we will fail in covering the breadth and scope of both of these practices…oh well.

Third, the observations to come are not meant to be judgmental or laden with approval/disapproval – they are simply observations. Those individuals working in both the meditation & law enforcement communities have my support, & it is from a place of interest that I enter the discussion about them.

Why would the police meditate? (We’re talking about on-the-job meditation – not any personal practice at home.) There have been a few internet publications about this recently [see list below]. There are at least some of us who are of the opinion that when it comes to police and law enforcement, the United States is in a crisis. This crisis, as described by Buddhist dharma teacher and former police officer Cheri Maples, is characterized by “[an] unnecessary use of force, racial profiling, militarization of police departments, lack of trust between communities and police departments, lack of strategies to address trauma and emotional health of police officers, unconscious and unspoken organizational agreements in police culture, and a lack of informal safety nets for people across the country….” All of these issues warrant immediate and honest speculation on how to improve our state of affairs. And for the past several years, especially in the midwestern United States, the quest for solutions has been a hot topic. Among existing thoughts on how to reform police practices is the idea of introducing and/or standardizing traditional mental and emotional training techniques for law enforcement.

A healthy amount of the existing chatter in this conversation comes in from the angle of affective neuroscience. Affective neuroscience is the multidisciplinary study of the nervous system in the context of mood, emotion, and affective processing. One of the pioneers in this field who has publicly offered thoughts about police work is the research psychologist Richard J Davidson, a Harvard-trained buddy of the Dalai Lama who does most of his brain research in Madison, Wisconsin. Richie is a righteous dude who gave me the chance to chat with him when I was 19 – not too long after I had some experiences at the hands of the Madison Police Department that were not ideal. A year later, just as my own personal Zazen practice was deepening, he let me volunteer in his laboratory in Madison. I am grateful both for his input on my experiences and career at that time, and for my current opportunity to reciprocate.

Because a lot of Davidson’s work has focused on the neurophysiology of mental illness, well-being, and other emotional states, it seems clear why he might be interested in the neural correlates of (and effective steps towards) compassionate police work. Not only do police officers deal with homelessness, mental illness, and behavioral crises on the job – they also go home with personal trauma. This is notwithstanding the myriad instances of police brutality in the news, including some shootings in Madison and some unfortunate practices in Dane County Jail. Mediating stress, fear, anxiety, and panic responses under pressure are certainly complex issues at the level of media social discourse, but also at the level of the central nervous system – Dr. Davidson seems to be interested in connecting the two. He is already helping to get the police to meditate. According to a 2015 article in the Atlantic he has been helping the police in Madison, Wisconsin to either learn some contemplative practices or to connect them with someone who can. (I’ve reached out to the handful of officers that I know in the MPD to see what they think about it – updates to come.)

This seems like a great idea to me…generally speaking. But what are the specifics? What benefit(s) to police tactics or police work overall might be found in sitting practice? As much as I love both topics I wonder why the MPD first chose to talk to Richie: in other words, I am skeptical about the immediate intersectionality between police practices and high-level neuroscience research. Certainly as a prominent researcher of meditation (and a personal meditator himself) Richie likely some great insights about how the practice works, as well as great connections in terms of teachers. But is he really the best (or only) individual to be providing such practices or consultation to the police? With no information about the program in place at the Madison Police Department I can’t say much. But my academic familiarity with Richie’s research, experiences in his lab, encounters with the Madison police, EMT training, my personal Zen practice, and role as a law enforcement instructor for the Barbara Schneider Foundation have given me a thought or two: I have some initial doubts about the application of “mindfulness” to law enforcement. My opinion is that the types of mindfulness practices – at least those being explored at the Center for Healthy Minds (previously the Center for Investigating Healthy Minds), where Davidson is in charge – are likely beneficial for the emotional stability of police officers, but perhaps less relevant during actual fieldwork or crisis intervention.  Elsewhere there are similar programs – a quick Google search shows that meditation programs are appearing in a variety of police departments. A mindfulness program in Oregon has been implemented for several years now, and some initial results and data shared at a conference in April 2014. There’s also some similar stuff happening in India. As a certified EMT and supporter of technology I have wondered about the possible efficacy of some type of an App for blending these skill sets – a mindfulness trainer for law enforcement and EMS that could fit in one’s pocket. Maybe that will be the subject of further research and another brief piece. Time will tell how these law enforcement/meditation programs play out and it is my modest prediction that the futures of neuroscience research, public interest, police work, and federal/municipal/private funding may continue to overlap in a big way.




(9/30/2015) http://www.thewayofmeditation.com.au/blog/the-current-crisis-in-policing-and-how-buddhist-mindfulness-can-help/

(7/2014) http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/nov/07/india-police-yoga-meditation-police-crime-figures

(4/16/2014) http://www.oregonlive.com/hillsboro/index.ssf/2014/04/hillsboro_cops_meditation_trai.html

(early 2014) https://www.change.org/p/president-of-the-united-states-make-it-mandatory-that-police-officers-meditate

(3/4/2013) http://www.tm.org/blog/people/transcendental-meditation-helps-police-with-ptsd/

(fall 2011) http://www.ntoa.org/massemail/RyanFA11.pdf

(2/15/11) http://www.spiritvoyage.com/blog/index.php/from-police-officer-to-peace-officer-meditation-and-cops